Support & service

AI for the calls and tickets your team handles every day, without the conversations leaving your organisation.

The shift ends with forty calls still to tag by hand, and half the floor started three months ago and asks the same question every day. Inferana summarises, tags and answers from your procedures inside your own infrastructure.

The rules that apply to you, point by point

What each regulation in your sector requires, and which part of that the deployment solves.

AI Act

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, art. 5 and 50
What it requires

Tell people they are dealing with an AI; inferring employee emotions at work is prohibited.

How we solve it

We do no emotion analysis on agents. Open models with published documentation and an audit trail of every query for your assessment.

GDPR

Regulation (EU) 2016/679
What it requires

Minimisation and confidentiality of the personal data that shows up in calls, tickets and transcripts.

How we solve it

Prompts and responses are never stored or used to train models, and processing runs in the EU or in your data centre.

ePrivacy

Directive 2002/58/EC
What it requires

Confidentiality of the communication and safeguards for recording a call involving both parties.

How we solve it

Transcripts are analysed by models running on your own infrastructure, with no copy of the conversation sent to a third party.

PCI DSS

Version 4.0
What it requires

Protect cardholder data wherever it ends up, including call recordings and their transcripts.

How we solve it

No storage of prompts or responses, and deployment inside your own environment, within the scope you already have certified.

Your most common use cases

The same ones you already use, specific to your sector.

See all use cases

Half the shift goes into writing up what already happened.
Tagging, summarising, closing the ticket.

Volume does not drop, the floor turns over every few months, and average handling time is the only number the client looks at. What follows is always the same:

What happens today

I train a new intake every month and we churn forty per cent a year.

Training

The shift ends and the disposition codes are still not in.

Floor supervision

We listen to two per cent of the calls and sign off the rest.

Quality lead

Every agent answers something different because the procedure is two years old.

Knowledge management

Fifteen seconds of handling time decide whether the contract makes money.

Operations lead

We serve six clients and none of them wants their data near the others.

Service delivery

The works council asks whether we plan to score how agents feel.

Employee relations

With Inferana

The knowledge base answers a new agent from day one, with your procedures and in your language.
The summary and the disposition code come out of the transcript on hang-up, and the agent checks them in seconds.
Analysis across one hundred per cent of your transcripts inside your perimeter, using the quality criteria you already apply.
RAG over your internal sources: the answer arrives with the current version of the procedure and the article it came from.
Assistance during the call and an automatic wrap-up on hang-up, so after-call work stops adding to handling time.
One team per client, each with its own knowledge base and its own access control, and the conversations never cross.
We do no emotion analysis on agents. What gets measured is whether the procedure was followed, and every query is logged.

Sector FAQs

It takes the repetitive work: the call summary, the disposition code, the first-line answer already written in the procedure. The hard conversation, the one with a real complaint behind it, stays with a person. What changes is where the agent's time goes.

From your sources, with the article each answer came from in plain sight. If that article is stale, the answer comes out stale, and that is where you see what needs fixing. Comparing what agents answer against what the procedure says surfaces the list of what nobody has updated. Maintaining the base stays your job.

On our side no copy remains: prompts and responses are never stored. Even so, the sensible move is to mask them first, and open models can detect and replace the number inside your own environment. PCI DSS scope and certification stay yours.

Yes, by measuring the work. Art. 5 of the AI Act prohibits inferring an employee's emotions in the workplace, so we do not offer that analysis. Checking whether the procedure was followed, whether the mandatory disclosure was given or whether the case was resolved sits on the permitted side, and the record of every query lets you review how the score was reached.

Yes, when the system interacts directly with the person. Art. 50 requires the disclosure, and you place it in your own channel, with your wording and your brand. We provide the model documentation and the interaction log to back it up when someone asks.

Wherever you decide: on European infrastructure we manage, or on-premise on yours. Access control is per user and per team, so quality sees the samples assigned to it and the rest of the floor does not. Every query is logged and exportable.

Yes. With access control per user and per team you can run one team per client, with its own knowledge base, and keep the conversations from crossing over. Every query is logged with who made it, which is what your client will ask for when they audit the service.

No. The API is OpenAI-compatible: point the connector you already use at our endpoint with a different key and what you run keeps working. Transcript work comes in through that same path.

Yes, with the same key. There the query does go out to the model provider, so transcripts and anything carrying customer data are handled by the open models inside your perimeter. It is configured per team.

Tell us what you want to deploy and we will show you where Inferana fits.

In the demo we go through your case: which models you need, where they run and what it takes to meet the regulation that applies to you.

We reply within one business day.